Cases 41 - 50 of 63
Baez-Molina v. Romero Alcover et al
as 3:2015cv01046
Plaintiff:
Armando Baez-Molina
Defendant:
Oniel Romero-Alcover, Luis Javier Concepcion-Rosado, Eliezer Rivera-Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01135
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01116
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01830
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Alamo-Hornedo et al v. Ortiz-Martinez et al
as 3:2012cv01403
Plaintiff:
Maritza Alamo-Hornedo and Maria Ivette Declet-Vargas
Defendant:
Gloria Ortiz-Martinez, Maria Sanchez-Bras, Juan Carlos Puig and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv01331
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv01228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv01072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703
Alamo-Hornedo et al vs Ortiz-Martinez, et al
as 3:2011cv02046
Plaintiff:
Maritza Alamo-Hornedo , Migdalia Diaz-Matos and Maria Ivette Declet-Vargas
Defendant:
Gloria Ortiz-Martinez, Members Junta de Reestructuracion y Estabilization Economica y Fiscal (JREF), Maria Sanchez-Bras and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv01194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
