Cases 41 - 50 of 324
Higley v. State of Utah, et al
as 23-4033
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK LEE HIGLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF UTAH, SPENCER COX, Governor, TOOELE COUNTY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-10616
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Eggleston v. State of Utah et al
as 1:2023cv00011
Plaintiff:
Tawnie-Renee Eggleston
Defendant:
David W Fureigh, Debra Jensen, Rebecca Voymas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Eggleston v. State of Utah et al
as 1:2023cv00080
Plaintiff:
Tawnie-Renee Eggleston
Defendant:
State of Utah, David W Fureigh, Debra Jensen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Allen v. State of Utah
as 2:2022cv00789
Plaintiff:
Cari Allen
Defendant:
State of Utah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vilela v. Office of Recovery Services et al
as 2:2022cv00699
Plaintiff:
Pedro Vilela
Defendant:
Office of Recovery Services, State of Utah Child Support Enforcement, Liesa Stockdale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bloomquist v. State of Utah et al
as 2:2022cv00659
Plaintiff:
Darrell Bloomquist
Defendant:
State of Utah, Leonard Isaacson, Mark Watkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Colwell v. State of Utah
as 2:2022cv00495
Plaintiff:
Patrick Alexander Colwell
Defendant:
State of Utah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ravines de Schur v. State of Utah, et al
as 22-4065
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANA MARIA RAVINES DE SCHUR
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF UTAH, HOUSING AUTHORITY OF SALT LAKE CITY, REGION US HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT and others
Ravines de Schur v. Unified Police Department
as 22-4062
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANA MARIA RAVINES DE SCHUR
Defendant / Appellee:
UNIFIED POLICE DEPARTMENT and STATE OF UTAH
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
