Cases 41 - 48 of 48
CONJURED UP ENTERTAINMENT et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2011cv01475
Plaintiff:
CONJURED UP ENTERTAINMENT and ANTHONY M. BUSSIE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL COURT OF CLAIMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHAH et al v. STATE OF WISCONSIN et al
as 3:2011cv00419
Plaintiff:
I. SHAH, A. SHAH and FAMILY
Defendant:
STATE OF WISCONSIN, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
BUSSIE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2011cv00098
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY BUSSIE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, GEORGE W. BUSH, JR., RICHARD CHENEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ROBINSON v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 2:2010cv06486
Plaintiff:
SHEILA ROBINSON
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALA'AD-DIN BEY v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 2:2010cv05995
Plaintiff:
GRAND SHEIK DR. ADMIRAL ALA'AD-DIN BEY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, MAHLON L. FAST, JSC, EUGENE J. CODEY, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
BREWER v. UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE et al
as 2:2010cv03204
Plaintiff:
DENNIS SHELDON BREWER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE, UNITED STATES CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, UNITED STATES FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2007cv02293
Plaintiff:
ALPHONSE WILLIAMS and JOAN WILLIAMS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, LAWRENCE P. BLASKOPF, RONALD M. SETTIMO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01694
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
