Cases 41 - 50 of 975
Hmoud, et al v. City Of Cincinnati, et al
as 1:2023cv00187
Plaintiff:
ahmad hmoud and Liberty Used Tires, LLC
Defendant:
City Of Cincinnati, Sheryl Long, Emily Smart Woerner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Assily v. Cuyahoga Community College District et al
as 1:2023cv00629
Plaintiff:
Rania Assily
Defendant:
Cuyahoga Community College District, Kimberly Johnson, Alexander Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00483
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Summit Behavioral Healthcare
as 2:2023cv01522
Petitioner:
James Williams
Respondent:
Summit Behavioral Healthcare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Summit Behavioral Healthcare
as 2:2023oe01522
Petitioner:
James Williams
Respondent:
Summit Behavioral Healthcare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00940
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00217
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Rozzell v. CSWMFT Ohio et al
as 1:2023cv00791
Defendant:
Terence Rozzell, CSWMFT Ohio and William L. Hegarty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Gilligan v. Hocking County, Ohio et al
as 2:2023cv00625
Plaintiff:
Allison Gilligan
Defendant:
Hocking County, Ohio, The City of Logan, Ohio, William Mickey Sharpe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
