Cases 41 - 50 of 60
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv05711
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
TOMLIN v. THE CITY OF PATERSON et al
as 2:2010cv03523
Plaintiff:
BOBBY TOMLIN
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PATERSON, PATERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT, R. RODRIGUEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEWIS v. EAST ORANGE POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2010cv03279
Plaintiff:
ANDY LEWIS
Defendant:
EAST ORANGE POLICE DEPARTMENT, PHILIP DAVIS, QUANTINA WALKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01321
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
RIZAS v. BUSH et al
as 2:2009cv04031
Plaintiff:
NICK RIZAS
Defendant:
GEORGE WALKER BUSH, RICHARD BRUCE "DICK" CHENEY, JON S. CORZINE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv03765
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WALKER et al v. WALKER et al
as 2:2009cv02186
Plaintiff:
GLORIA WALKER, QUIANNA MARTIN WALKER, KYAHEM MARTIN WALKER and others
Defendant:
LAMONT WALKER, CLIFTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, BRODIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DELUCCIA v. THE CITY OF PATERSON et al
as 2:2009cv00703
Plaintiff:
DENNIS DELUCCIA
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PATERSON, PATERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT, VAUGHN PATTERSON and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
EDWARDS v. THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2008cv05617
Plaintiff:
RENE EDWARDS
Defendant:
THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, THE NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD, PETER BARNES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv04939
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
