Cases 41 - 50 of 61
GRAY v. WARNER ROBINS GEORGIA et al
as 5:2015cv00217
Plaintiff:
NAPOLEON GRAY
Defendant:
WARNER ROBINS GEORGIA and HOUSTON COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Warner v. City of East Point
as 1:2014cv00323
Plaintiff:
Steve Warner
Defendant:
City of East Point
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
BRIGHTMAN v. WARNER ROBINS GEORGIA et al
as 5:2013cv00468
Plaintiff:
THOMAS A BRIGHTMAN
Defendant:
WARNER ROBINS GEORGIA, CHARLES BEAUCHEA and MARIANNE GOLMITZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis et al v. Stack et al
as 1:2013cv00776
Plaintiff:
Jasmine C. Lewis and Emanuel Brooks-Lewis
Defendant:
Bill Stack, Donald Feinsilver, Nicholas E. Claditis and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv03561
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00395
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Warner v. City of East Point
as 1:2012cv02851
Plaintiff:
Steve Warner
Defendant:
City of East Point
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
Youhoing et al v. Clayton County Police Department et al
as 1:2012cv00738
Plaintiff:
Shennielle Shellielle Youhoing, Mahabir Nanan, Mohaberry D. Youhoing-Nanan and others
Defendant:
Clayton County Police Department, Clayton County Board of Commissioners, Clayton County Animal Control and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Youhoing et al v. Clayton County Police Department et al
as 1:2012cv00736
Plaintiff:
Shennielle Shelle Youhoing, Mahabir Nanan, Mohaberry D. Youhoing-Nanan and others
Defendant:
Clayton County Police Department, Clayton County Sheriff Department, Clayton County Animal Control and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CROSBY v. WARNER ROBINS, GEORGIA et al
as 5:2011cv00428
Plaintiff:
DONALD CROSBY
Defendant:
Warner Robins, Georgia , STEVE WARMACK and HARRY DENNARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
