Cases 41 - 50 of 329
LOUIS v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY
as 2:2022cv04490
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, POLICE SUPER. (FMR) PATRICK SHANNON, ANN RUBIN and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES LOUIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04415
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
KAMDEN-OUAFFO v. SPATARO et al
as 1:2022cv03285
Plaintiff:
RICKY KAMDEN-OUAFFO
Defendant:
AMBER M. SPATARO, BERNARD JACQUES, DANIELLE M. DWYER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01793
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01887
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
REAVES v. MONMOUTH UNIVERSITY et al
as 3:2022cv01782
Plaintiff:
JACQUELYN REAVES
Defendant:
MONMOUTH UNIVERSITY, JOANNE JORDY, GEORGE KAPALKA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01171
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00989
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00721
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
JOHNSON v. IBIS STYLES HOTEL et al
as 2:2022cv00588
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W. JOHNSON
Defendant:
IBIS STYLES HOTEL, MISS RODRIGUEZ, ANDREA EADDY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
