Cases 51 - 60 of 131
JORDAN v. TOWN OF WALDOBORO et al
as 2:2017cv00025
Plaintiff:
SCOTT JORDAN, JR
Defendant:
TOWN OF WALDOBORO , WALDOBORO POLICE DEPARTMENT , WILLIAM LABOMBARDE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00585
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PAPI et al v. TOWN OF GORHAM et al
as 2:2016cv00560
Plaintiff:
JOHN PAPI and JOHN J PAPI LLC
Defendant:
TOWN OF GORHAM, TOWN OF GORHAM TOWN COUNCIL, TOWN OF GORHAM TOWN CLERK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAY et al v. TOWN OF BUXTON et al
as 2:2016cv00377
Plaintiff:
STACEY DAY , GREGORY HOAR and MICHAEL CROCKETT
Defendant:
TOWN OF BUXTON , MICHAEL S GROVO , KEVIN COLLINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUTCHINS v. SKOWHEGAN SAVING BANK et al
as 1:2016cv00280
Plaintiff:
BONNY LOU BUZZELL HUTCHINS
Defendant:
SKOWHEGAN SAVING BANK, ADAM & EVE HAIRCARE, COMMUNITY CRISIS COUNSELING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COPP et al v. TOWN OF CUMBERLAND BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT & APPEALS
as 2:2016cv00213
Plaintiff:
ELVIN COPP and RANDALL COPP
Defendant:
TOWN OF CUMBERLAND BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT & APPEALS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TRASK v. TOWN OF MADISON et al
as 1:2016cv00077
Plaintiff:
DAVID E TRASK
Defendant:
TOWN OF MADISON , SOMERSET COUNTY and SHERIFF DALE LANCASTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FITZPATRICK v. EMERY et al
as 1:2016cv00076
Plaintiff:
MOLLY FITZPATRICK
Defendant:
KEITH EMERY and CITY OF OLD TOWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WOODBRIDGE CONDOMINIUMS v. TOWN OF OLD ORCHARD BEACH
as 2:2016cv00026
Plaintiff:
WOODBRIDGE CONDOMINIUMS
Defendant:
TOWN OF OLD ORCHARD BEACH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOORE v. TOWN OF WELLS et al
as 2:2015cv00356
Plaintiff:
DANIEL M MOORE
Defendant:
TOWN OF WELLS and JONATHAN L CARTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
