Cases 51 - 60 of 651
BROWN v. HOOKS
as 4:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL B BROWN and MASON B BROWN
Defendant:
ROBERT HOOKS, KERTAVIOUS COPPINS, AARON GUILLAUME and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02487
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02373
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02244
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Selestan-Bey v. Person-Garner et al
as 1:2023cv01975
Plaintiff:
Kayla Keona Selestan-Bey, Kayla Keona Selestan, Evelyn Denise Barrett-Bey and others
Defendant:
Tiana Jean Person-Garner, William Franklin Brogdon, Gene F. Cantrell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01920
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Glass v. Brown
as 1:2023cv01845
Plaintiff:
Kardarius Kantrez Glass
Defendant:
Judge Michael L. Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00063
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
BROWN v. HAGGARD et al
as 3:2023cv00043
Plaintiff:
FREDDIE DINO BROWN
Defendant:
JUDGE H PATRICK HAGGARD, THISLE, CHRISTINE M SCANTZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hakeem v. Adams et al
as 6:2023cv00028
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Hakeem
Defendant:
Brian D. Adams, Jennifer Jarriel, Vashti J. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
