Cases 51 - 60 of 279
Pearce v. City of Portland et al
as 3:2022cv00518
Plaintiff:
Dexter Pearce
Defendant:
City of Portland and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Woodley v. City of Portland
as 3:2022cv00423
Plaintiff:
Linda Woodley
Defendant:
City of Portland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bello v. City of Portland et al
as 3:2022cv00411
Plaintiff:
Jorge Bello
Defendant:
City of Portland and Portland Police Offc John Oliphant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Hall v. City of Portland et al
as 3:2022cv00074
Plaintiff:
Joseph Hall
Defendant:
City of Portland and Edward Tevis Wheeler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01839
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Langvin v. City of Portland et al
as 3:2021cv01595
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Langvin
Defendant:
City of Portland and John Does, 1-20
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hardt v. City of Portland et al
as 3:2021cv01515
Plaintiff:
Dale Everett Hardt
Defendant:
City of Portland, Mayor Ted Wheeler, Johann Hardesty and others
Mendoza v. City of Portland et al
as 3:2021cv01503
Plaintiff:
Maria Mendoza
Defendant:
City of Portland by and through Portland Police Bureau, Portland Police Offc John 1 Doe, Portland Police Offc John Doe, 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Carrillo v. City of Portland et al
as 3:2021cv01340
Plaintiff:
LUCAS S. CARRILLO, Personal Representative of the Estate of Aaron Joseph Danielson, and Lucas Carrillo
Defendant:
The City of Portland, Michael Schmidt, Edward Ted Wheeler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mitsch v. City of Portland et al
as 3:2021cv01222
Plaintiff:
Alonna Mitsch
Defendant:
City of Portland, Kyle Green, Ken Le and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
