Cases 51 - 60 of 150
FINNEMEN v. URICOECHEA et al
as 1:2017cv01680
Plaintiff:
NASIR FINNEMEN
Defendant:
FRED URICOECHEA, CAMDEN COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, ADAM JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. CFG HEALTH SYSTEMS LLC et al
as 1:2016cv08980
Plaintiff:
TERRELL WILLIAMS
Defendant:
CFG HEALTH SYSTEMS LLC, COUNTY OF CAMDEN, CAMDEN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BROWN v. CAMDEN COUNTY BOARD OF SOCIAL SERVICES
as 1:2016cv08883
Plaintiff:
AMOS BROWN
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY BOARD OF SOCIAL SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THE ESTATE OF FREDDY BAEZ JR. v.CAMDEN COUNTY et al
as 1:2016cv05653
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY, JOHN SCOTT THOMSON and CAMDEN COUNTY POLICE OFFICERS JOHN DOE #'S 1-4
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF FREDDY BAEZ JR. and VERONICA CABRERA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
JACOBS v. BOROUGH OF LINDENWOLD et al
as 1:2016cv05376
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH JACOBS
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF LINDENWOLD , LINDENWOLD POLICE DEPARTMENT , RONALD D. BURROWS, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BETHEA v. DICKINSON
as 1:2016cv04142
Plaintiff:
QUINZELLE BETHEA
Defendant:
DOUGLAS DICKINSON and CAMDEN COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HICKS v. CAMDEN COUNTY et al
as 1:2016cv03436
Plaintiff:
RICHARD A HICKS, JR
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY, CAMDEN COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, CAMDEN COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, METRODIVISION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01108
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
PERCELL v. REED et al
as 1:2016cv00519
Plaintiff:
RASHEEN PERCELL
Defendant:
PRINCE REED, NICHOLAS VOORHEES and CAMDEN COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al v. BEY
as 1:2015cv08222
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, CAMDEN MUNICIPAL COURT, CAMDEN COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Defendant:
NASIR EL RAZUL BEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
