Cases 51 - 60 of 67
Saxon v. The City of Utica, New York et al
as 6:2011cv01180
Plaintiff:
Jerome Saxon
Defendant:
The City of Utica, New York, Daniel N. Labella, Wayne Manolescu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pearce et al v. Estate of Officer Joseph A. Longo, Jr. et al
as 6:2010cv01569
Plaintiff:
Gina M. Pearce , Steven L. Pearce and Joseph Longo
Defendant:
Estate of Officer Joseph A. Longo, Jr., Daniel Labella , David R. Roefaro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. The City of Utica, New York et al
as 6:2010cv01539
Plaintiff:
Shatasha Brown
Defendant:
The City of Utica, New York , Peter Paladino , Anthony Stucchi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Sequinot v. City of Utica Police Department
as 6:2010cv01387
Plaintiff:
Miguel Sequinot
Defendant:
City of Utica Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2010cv01350
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Minor v. Curley et al
as 6:2010cv01238
Plaintiff:
Dasmin L. Minor
Defendant:
Michael Curley, Howard Brodt, James Holt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Minasi v. City of Utica, New York et al
as 6:2010cv00975
Plaintiff:
Mark R. Minasi
Defendant:
City of Utica, New York, George De Angelo and Michael Hauck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sheppard v. Curley et al
as 6:2010cv00921
Plaintiff:
Ann Sheppard
Defendant:
Michael Curley, Frank Mucitelli and City of Utica, New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gordon v. Oneida County Prosecutors Office et al
as 3:2010cv00476
Plaintiff:
Ronald Gordon
Defendant:
Oneida County Prosecutors Office and The City of Utica Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2010cv00095
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
