Cases 51 - 60 of 866
OLIVEIRA v CITY OF NORTH WILDWOOD et al
as 1:2023cv20838
Plaintiff:
danielle oliveira
Defendant:
CITY OF WILDWOOD, CITY OF NORTH WILDWOOD, NORTH WILDWOOD PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv20502
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
BOSTARD v WILDWOOD CREST BORO, et al
as 1:2023cv18574
Plaintiff:
GREGORY BOSTARD
Defendant:
WILDWOOD CREST BORO, DET/CPL JAMES COLLINS, CAPTAIN RICHARD D'AMICO, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv17570
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv14037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
SMART v. TOWNSHIP OF TOMS RIVER et al
as 3:2023cv10723
Plaintiff:
KYLE SMART
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF TOMS RIVER, LOUIS TARANTO and JOHN DOES 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
POMASKI v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION et al
as 3:2023cv10764
Plaintiff:
JASON POMASKI
Defendant:
MICROSOFT CORPORATION, MICHAEL INDENBOM, CHADD TATE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv06314
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04330
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv04175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
