Cases 51 - 60 of 71
Creighton v. Village of Tinley Park et al
as 1:2011cv04372
Plaintiff:
John Creighton
Defendant:
Village of Tinley Park , Duane Pulchinski , W Grabs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Luster v. Meredith et al
as 1:2011cv01018
Plaintiff:
Alan Luster
Defendant:
Martin Meredith, John Doe, 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOE 1 et al v. COURY et al
as 1:2011cv00091
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE 1 , JOHN DOE 2 and JOHN DOE 3
Defendant:
PHILIP COURY, THOMAS O'HERN, JAMES DIETE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Huddleston v. Alton IL et al
as 3:2010cv00995
Plaintiff:
Harry Huddleston
Defendant:
City of Alton IL, David Hayes, Alton Memorial Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
v. Doe #1 et al
as 1:2010cv07065
Defendant:
John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and City of Blue Island, Illinois
Plaintiff:
Paul Tomsic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. Office of Illinois Attorney General et al
as 1:2010cv06449
Plaintiff:
Maisha Imani Hamilton
Defendant:
Office of Illinois Attorney General, Lisa Madigan, Fotopolous and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zoretic v. Darte et al
as 1:2010cv06011
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Zoretic
Defendant:
Darte, Dyson, John Sheriff Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cordero Jr. v. Doe 1 et al
as 1:2010cv04193
Plaintiff:
Luis Cordero Jr.
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and John Doe 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzalez v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2010cv01092
Plaintiff:
Jesus Gonzalez
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Chicago Police Department, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe 1 et al., v. The Catholic Archdiocese of Chicago, et al.,
as 1:2009cv07656
Plaintiff:
John Doe I, John Doe 2, John Doe 3 and others
Defendant:
The Catholic Archdiocese of Chicago, The Catholic Archdiocese of Chicago, The Catholic Archdiocese of Chicago and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
