Cases 51 - 60 of 74
Farmer v. Jackson et al
as 1:2011cv00977
Plaintiff:
Curtis S. Farmer
Defendant:
Theodore Jackson , James Carter , Michael Cooke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Graham v. The City of Duluth et al
as 1:2011cv00515
Plaintiff:
Leresa Graham
Defendant:
The City of Duluth , Jay Matthew Dailey , R. D. Belcher and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
Anderson v. Matthews et al
as 4:2010cv00224
Plaintiff:
L. Vincent Anderson
Defendant:
Walter J. Matthews, Kristina Cook Connelly Graham, Bobby Lee Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turpen et al v. Douglas County et al
as 1:2010cv01815
Plaintiff:
Tommy E. Turpen, Jr. and David Logan Turpen
Defendant:
Douglas County, Tom Worthan, Freddie Ashmon, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ransom v. The City of East Point et al
as 1:2009cv03629
Plaintiff:
Ray F. Ransom
Defendant:
The City of East Point, Leander Robinson, Hugh Riley and others
Ransom v. The City of East Point et al
as 1:2009mi00539
Plaintiff:
Ray F. Ransom
Defendant:
The City of East Point, Leander Robinson, Hugh Riley and others
Howell v. Houston County, Georgia et al
as 5:2009cv00402
Plaintiff:
Shamel Howell, Shamel Howell and Shamel Howell
Defendant:
Houston County, Georgia, Cullen Talton, Houston County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Buccini v. Schlossberg et al
as 1:2009cv01015
Plaintiff:
Karolina Kennedy Buccini
Defendant:
Caroline Kennedy Schlossberg, Edwin Schlossberg, Rose Schlossberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00967
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Buccini v. Schlossberg et al
as 1:2009mi00134
Plaintiff:
Karolina Kennedy Buccini
Defendant:
Caroline Kennedy Schlossberg, Edwin Schlossberg, Rose Schlossberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
