Cases 51 - 59 of 59
Medina v. John Doe
as 1:2014cv01205
Plaintiff:
Ernest Daniel Medina
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Durkee v. Minor, et al
as 1:2014cv00745
Plaintiff:
James Durkee
Defendant:
John Minor , Ron Hochmuth , John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berry v. Sluder et al
as 1:2013cv02647
Plaintiff:
Theresa Berry
Defendant:
Chris Sluder, Brandon Beauvais, Chad Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe et al v. McAfee et al
as 1:2013cv01287
Plaintiff:
John Doe , Jane Doe , Girl Doe 1 and others
Defendant:
Joanna McAfee , Kathy Tremaine , Lisa Little and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Martin et al v. Cathy et al
as 1:2012cv02784
Plaintiff:
Ralph Vincent Martin and Margaret A Martin
Defendant:
Carrigan Cathy, Wesley Zuber, Scott Prendergast and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Billinger v. Doe Number 01, et al.
as 1:2012cv01507
Plaintiff:
Bradford John Conde Billinger
Defendant:
John Doe Number 01, Pearl Chang, Burt Rizzo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Freedom From Religion Foundation, Inc. et al v. Cherry Creek School District et al
as 1:2007cv02126
Plaintiff:
Freedom From Religion Foundation, Inc., John Doe, DoeChild and others
Defendant:
Cherry Creek School District and Monte C. Moses
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Hickenlooper et al
as 1:2007cv00154
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Smith, Sr.
Defendant:
John Hickenlooper, Gerry Whitman, Brill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Simpson, et al v. University CO Bldr
as 1:2002cv02390
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe, Lisa Simpson and Anne Gilmore
Defendant:
University of Colorado at Boulder
Intervenor:
John Doe
Interested Party:
Denver Publishing Company, Marques Harris and Colt Brennan
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
