Cases 51 - 60 of 217
Tietbohl v. Kaplan et al
as 1:2018cv04283
Plaintiff:
Yafit Damari Tietbohl
Defendant:
Deborah A. Kaplan, Andrew Coyle, Ira Lifman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bolton v. State University of New York et al
as 6:2018cv06345
Plaintiff:
Benjamin J. Bolton
Defendant:
State University of New York, Seth Gilbertson, Ana Cervantes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv03652
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Vidurek et al v. Cuomo et al
as 1:2018cv00392
Plaintiff:
Cerus Maarten, Michelle Frioco, Michael Anthony Livecche, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Governor Andrew M. Cuomo, Assemblyman Carl E. Heastie and John J. Flanagan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01809
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bukowski v. Spinner et al
as 2:2017cv06693
Defendant:
Dennis M. Brown, Philip Castrovinci, Mary Beth Daniels and others
Plaintiff:
Joyelle Bukowski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv06388
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Bukowski v. Spinner et al
as 1:2017cv08138
Plaintiff:
Joyelle Bukowski
Defendant:
Jeffrey A. Spinner, Matthew Hughes, Mary Beth Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thomas v. The People of the State of New York et al
as 5:2017cv01159
Plaintiff:
Antwan Thomas
Defendant:
The People of the State of New York, District Attorney, Joann M. Winslow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00903
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
