Cases 51 - 60 of 102
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01488
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stancliff v. Rutherford County Sheriff's Department
as 3:2016cv01446
Plaintiff:
Patricia Susan Stancliff
Defendant:
Rutherford County Sheriff's Department and (f/n/u) Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01367
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00193
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
Johnson et al v. Rutherford County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2015cv01495
Plaintiff:
Melissa Gale Johnson , Ernest Wade Johnson and Robert Lee Johnson
Defendant:
Rutherford County, Tennessee , Robert Arnold , Ken Tucker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rhody v. Rutherford County Board of Education
as 3:2015cv01153
Plaintiff:
Randy Rhody
Defendant:
Rutherford County Board of Education
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez et al v. Providence Community Corrections, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv01048
Plaintiff:
Cindy Rodriguez , Steven Gibbs , Paula Pullum and others
Defendant:
Providence Community Corrections, Inc. , Rutherford County, Tennessee , Jasmine Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00918
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
G.H. v. Rutherford County , Tennessee et al
as 3:2015cv00871
Plaintiff:
G.H.
Defendant:
Rutherford County , Tennessee , Rutherford County Board of Education , Markell Draine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
