Cases 51 - 60 of 131
Cook v. Hendrix et al
as 6:2016cv00313
Defendant:
Larry Hendrix, John Doe and Terry Park
Plaintiff:
Newton Cook, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00412
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bigby et al v. Nichols et al
as 6:2016cv00184
Plaintiff:
Terry Bigby , Mark Bigby and LaHoma Bigby
Defendant:
Jason Nichols , Diane Weston , Charles Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Barnes et al v. Oklahoma City City of et al
as 5:2016cv00184
Plaintiff:
Tabatha Barnes , Terri Morris , Syrita Bowen and others
Defendant:
Oklahoma City City of , Daniel Holtzclaw, Bill Citty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Byrum v. Glanz et al
as 4:2016cv00006
Plaintiff:
Terry Byrum
Defendant:
Stanley Glanz, Robert C Bates and Richard Weigel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nova Health Systems v. Pruitt et al
as 5:2015cv01209
Plaintiff:
Nova Health Systems
Defendant:
E Scott Pruitt , Steve Kunzweiler , Lyle Kelsey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Perry v. Clements et al
as 4:2015cv00095
Plaintiff:
Taunya Perry and Jennifer Miller
Defendant:
Terry Durborow and Daniel Clements
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv00089
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv01438
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DeLong v. Oklahoma Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services et al
as 5:2014cv01439
Plaintiff:
Michael DeLong
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services , Oklahoma Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services Board of Directors , Terry White and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
