Civil Rights Cases filed in Oklahoma
Cases 51 - 60 of 72
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00693
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Johnson et al v. Oklahoma Department of Human Services et al
as 5:2011cv00713
Plaintiff: Charles Daniel Johnson
Defendant: Oklahoma Department of Human Services , Howard H Hendrick , Louis C Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Murdock v. Walker-Shedd et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2011cv00391
Plaintiff: Wayne Murdock
Defendant: Denise Walker-Shedd and Terry Jenks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Bartlesville, City of et al
as 4:2011cv00232
Plaintiff: Jamaal Martez Smith
Defendant: Bartlesville, City of , Washington County Board of County Commissioners , Adam K Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv00115
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Walker v. Golden Corral Restaurant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2011cv00010
Plaintiff: Keeble Donale Walker
Defendant: Golden Corral Restaurant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Gannett, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2011cv00006
Plaintiff: Keeble Donale Walker
Defendant: Gannett, Muskogee Daily Phoenix and Tom Sconnover
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Gannett et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2011cv00007
Plaintiff: Keeble Donale Walker
Defendant: Gannett, Muskogee Daily Phoenix and Gary Poddey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Taco Mayo
as 6:2011cv00009
Plaintiff: Keeble Donale Walker
Defendant: Taco Mayo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. IHOP Pancake Restaurant 6932
as 6:2011cv00008
Plaintiff: Keeble Donale Walker
Defendant: IHOP Pancake Restaurant 6932
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?