Cases 51 - 60 of 300
Harding v. Watch Tower Bible & Tract Society of New York Inc et al
as 5:2021cv00515
Defendant:
Watch Tower Bible & Tract Society of New York Inc, Frank Lee, Samuel Portis and others
Plaintiff:
William L Harding
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00444
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Burke v. Norman et al
as 5:2021cv00361
Defendant:
Dakota Norman, Kevin Williams and Bobby Elmore
Plaintiff:
Jeff Burke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Webster et al v. Garland et al
as 6:2021cv00119
Plaintiff:
Paul Leroy Wickham, Dwayne Marvin Garrett and Shirley Dione Webster
Defendant:
Jim Felte, Christopher Wray, Claire V. Eagan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00088
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Pontious v. Trainor et al
as 5:2021cv00088
Plaintiff:
Glen A Pontious
Defendant:
Maxine Waters, James E Trainor, lll, Nancy Pelosi and others
Cursh et al v. Wal-Mart Corporations
as 4:2021cv00017
Plaintiff:
Shanika Cursh, Treveon Hayes, Ashanti Williams and others
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Corporations
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Kopaddy v. Pottawatomie County Public Safety Center et al
as 5:2020cv01280
Defendant:
J Duggan, Brad Baney, Breonna R Thompson and others
Plaintiff:
Eva Kopaddy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spray et al v. Board of County Commissioners of Oklahoma County et al
as 5:2020cv01252
Defendant:
Board of County Commissioners of Oklahoma County, John Whetsel and Armor Correctional Health Services Inc
Plaintiff:
William Ray Spray, Jr and Rhonda Jean Spray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00615
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
