Cases 51 - 60 of 785
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00940
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Thomas v. Pangburn
as 4:2023cv00047
Plaintiff:
Jerry Thomas
Defendant:
Kenneth D. Pangburn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas v. Pangbum
as 4:2023cv00046
Plaintiff:
Jerry Thomas
Defendant:
Kenneth D. Pangbum and Kenneth D. Pangburn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00835
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00740
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Similien v. The Walk at Legacy Condominium Association, Inc et al
as 1:2023cv00273
Plaintiff:
Peri Similien
Defendant:
The Walk at Legacy Condominium Association, Inc, Judge Jason D. Marbutt, Attorney Dana M Tucker Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harvey v. Yisrael
as 1:2023cv00160
Plaintiff:
Willie Harvey
Defendant:
Jonesboro Police Officer D. Yisrael
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Goodwine v. Hill et al
as 1:2023cv00057
Defendant:
Jail Officer A. D. F., J. L. L., Victor Hill and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Goodwine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McFadden v. United States of America et al
as 1:2022cv00162
Plaintiff:
Tyriquez L. McFadden, TYREE MCFADDEN and McFadden Tyriquez Lequan
Defendant:
United States of America, BOP, James Christian Stuchell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Glass v. Clayton County Superior Court et al
as 1:2022cv05009
Plaintiff:
Kardarius Kantrez Glass
Defendant:
Clayton County Superior Court and Jacqueline D. Willis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
