Cases 61 - 69 of 69
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv02322
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Davis et al v. National Collegiate Athletic Association et al
as 3:2011cv01207
Plaintiff:
Reginald Davis , Allen Chapman , Sua Tuala and others
Defendant:
National Collegiate Athletic Association , Mark G. Yudof , Robert J. Birgeneau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Santiago Ibarra Rivera v. Claus Hartleben et al
as 2:2011cv01453
Defendant:
Wendi Beaton, Wendi Beaton, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Santiago Ibarra Rivera
Mejia et al v. Weeks Wholesale Rose Grower, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv01396
Defendant:
Weeks Wholesale Rose Grower, Inc. and International Garden Products, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Teofilio Mejia , Margarito Ibarra , Alfonso Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Mejia et al v. Weeks Wholesale Rose Grower, Inc. et al
as 1:2010at00573
Defendant:
Weeks Wholesale Rose Grower, Inc., International Garden Products, Inc. and Margarito Ibarra
Plaintiff:
Teofilio Mejia , alfonso rivera , sergio vega and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Santiago Ibarra Rivera v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2010cv01861
Defendant:
John A. Clarke, County of Los Angeles, County of San Bernardino and others
Plaintiff:
Santiago Ibarra Rivera
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv00070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Martinez et al v. Imperial City of et al
as 3:2007cv01595
Plaintiff:
Gabriela Martinez, Santiago Ibarra, Sr, Carolina Ibarra and others
Defendant:
Imperial City of, El Centro City of, Tim Ramos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ibarra v. Wallace, et al.
as 1:2007cv00145
Plaintiff:
Jorge Pineda Ibarra
Defendant:
- Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
