Cases 61 - 70 of 93
Pyles v. Winters et al
as 1:2012cv00346
Defendant:
Philip Cicero, City of Medford, Scott Clauson and others
Plaintiff:
David J. Pyles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Torres v. Jackson County, Oregon
as 1:2012cv00227
Defendant:
Jackson County, Oregon
Plaintiff:
Donna Torres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00198
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2012cv00159
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Jackson et al v. Rainer School District No. 13 et al
as 3:2011cv00602
Defendant:
R. Michael Carter, Rainier School Board and Rainier School District No. 13
Plaintiff:
Bailey Jackson, Denning Jackson and Kim Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
King v. Jackson County et al
as 1:2011cv03048
Defendant:
David Avery, Jane Does, John Does and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wayne King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Webber v. First Student, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv03032
Defendant:
Ben Bergreen, First Student, Inc., Jackson County School District 4 and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Webber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv01134
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv01075
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv03065
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
