Cases 61 - 70 of 302
Adams v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2020cv02760
Defendant:
Officer Jeffrey Dohnal, City Of Chicago, Officer Diana Klaus and others
Plaintiff:
Antron Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glover-Bartley v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2020cv02775
Defendant:
Melissa Malm, Cesar Astorga, Thomas Oshaugnessy and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Glover-Bartley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Money et al v. Pritzker et al
as 1:2020cv02093
Plaintiff:
Carl Reed, Tewkunzi Green, Danny Labosette and others
Defendant:
Director of IDOC Rob Jeffreys, Governor J.B. Pritzker, Rob Jeffreys and others
Intervenor:
Jennifer Bishop-Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kohl v. Davis et al
as 1:2020cv01940
Defendant:
James Edwards, Danny Davis, Lake County and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Kohl
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2020cv01896
Defendant:
Robert Gonzalez, Debra Kirby, City Of Chicago and others
Plaintiff:
Demetris Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Penny v. Pelosi et al
as 2:2020cv02047
Defendant:
Antonio Delgado, Sharice Davids, Cheri Bustos and others
Plaintiff:
David H Penny and David Harold Penny
Interested Party:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fick v. Parker et al
as 3:2020cv50070
Plaintiff:
Adam Fick
Defendant:
The City of Belvidere and Brandon Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walls v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2020cv00877
Defendant:
Kwame Raoul, Illinois Court Commission, Lawana Jones-Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Dena Walls
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Weaver v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2020cv00474
Defendant:
Justin Concannon, Adam Tapling, Bernard Lee Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Weaver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv08519
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
