Cases 61 - 70 of 224
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv10724
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
BROWN v. CITY OF NEWARK et al
as 2:2018cv10039
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY BROWN
Defendant:
CITY OF NEWARK, NEWARK MUNICIPAL JAIL, RAS BARAKA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EVERSON v. CITY OF NEWARK et al
as 2:2018cv05703
Plaintiff:
LEONARD EVERSON
Defendant:
CITY OF NEWARK, CITY OF NEWARK POLICE DEPARTMENT, ABC CORP. 1-3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEMAY v. NEWARK
as 2:2018cv02239
Defendant:
CITY OF NEWARK
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEMAY, Jr.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BROWN v. CITY OF NEWARK et al
as 2:2018cv00082
Plaintiff:
KASHANDA BROWN
Defendant:
CITY OF NEWARK, KENNETH GAULETTE, JANE DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ABUBAKAR v. CITY OF NEWARK
as 2:2017cv12555
Plaintiff:
ALHASSAN I ABUBAKAR
Defendant:
CITY OF NEWARK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986 Neglect of Duty
TULLIS et al v. NEWARK et al
as 2:2017cv08797
Defendant:
CITY OF NEWARK , SILAS SMITH, JR., TYRONE MORTON and others
Plaintiff:
CORDELL TULLIS and JONIKA MATTHEWS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CABAN, JR. v. CITY OF NEWARK, et al.
as 2:2017cv08230
Defendant:
CITY OF NEWARK , CITY OF NEWARK POLICE DEPARTMENT , SAMUEL SOUTO, JR. and others
Plaintiff:
JAVIER CABAN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SCOTT v. CITY OF NEWARK
as 2:2017cv07835
Defendant:
CITY OF NEWARK , CITY OF NEWARK POLICE DEPARTMENT, JOHN DOE 1-5 and others
Plaintiff:
STEVEN SCOTT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DEPENDABLE INSURANCE AGENCY, INC. et al v. CITY OF NEWARK, TAX ASSESSORS DEPT et al
as 2:2017cv05574
Plaintiff:
DEPENDABLE INSURANCE AGENCY, INC. and PATRICK NELSON
Defendant:
CITY OF NEWARK, TAX ASSESSORS DEPT and MOORING TAX ASSET GROUP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
