Cases 61 - 70 of 74
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2009cv00214
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2009cv00205
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Craig v. Hobart City of et al
as 5:2009cv00053
Plaintiff:
James Craig
Defendant:
Hobart City of, Aaron King, Rex Brown and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Mann et al v. Board of County Commissioners of Okfuskee County, Oklahoma et al
as 6:2008cv00452
Plaintiff:
Bobby Lee Mann, Wesley Eugene Chandler, Matthew James Nunn and others
Defendant:
Board of County Commissioners of Okfuskee County, Oklahoma, Okfuskee County Sheriff's Department, Jack Choate and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2008cv00336
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv00700
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lewis v. Oklahoma State Board of Chiropractic Examiners et al
as 5:2008cv00382
Plaintiff:
Jeffery W Lewis
Defendant:
Oklahoma State Board of Chiropractic Examiners, Ronald Tripp, Russell Gilstrap and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv00615
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2007cv00190
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12181 Americans with Disabilities
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv00325
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
