Cases 61 - 70 of 73
Salyers v. City of Portsmouth, Ohio et al
as 0:2010cv00055
Defendant:
City of Portsmouth, Ohio, Charles H. Horner, David Thoroughman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00396
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Conner v. Clinton County Board of Education et al
as 1:2009cv00102
Plaintiff:
Steven Conner and Steven Conner
Defendant:
Clinton County Board of Education, Ned Davis, Paula Key and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Heath v. Payne et al
as 3:2008cv00247
Plaintiff:
Shy Heath
Defendant:
Carl Payne, William Brown, Chad Crick and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Davis v. McKinney et al
as 4:2008cv00117
Plaintiff:
James C. Davis
Defendant:
Brian McKinney and City of Madisonville, Kentucky
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00352
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00396
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Alston et al v. Kentucky High School Athletic Association et al
as 5:2008cv00178
Plaintiff:
E. Deedom Alston, Cornelius Dixie, J. Daniel White and others
Defendant:
Kentucky High School Athletic Association, Kentucky High School Athletic Association, Ted Sanford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. City of Smiths Grove et al
as 1:2007cv00146
Plaintiff:
Rondel L. Davis, Jr. and Rondel L. Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
City of Smiths Grove and David King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
