Cases 61 - 70 of 99
Porter v. Hammond City of et al
as 2:2013cv00319
Plaintiff:
David J Porter
Defendant:
Hammond City of , Hammond City of Police Department , Matthew Siegfried and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00207
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Crossley v. Hammond City of et al
as 2:2013cv00172
Plaintiff:
Bennie Crossley
Defendant:
Hammond City of , Hammond Police Department and William Reshkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Moreno-Avalos v. City Hall of Hammond Indiana et al
as 2:2013cv00038
Plaintiff:
Sonia Moreno-Avalos
Defendant:
City Hall of Hammond Indiana, Kurt Koch, Kim Nordhoff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hoppes v. Hammond et al
as 4:2012cv00053
Plaintiff:
Brenton A Hoppes
Defendant:
Kevin Hammond, Paul Redmon Flora, Stephen Mullin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Butler v. Allen County Indiana et al
as 1:2012cv00308
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Sue Butler
Defendant:
Allen County Indiana, Fort Wayne City of, Allen Superior Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Graham v. Hammond Indiana School City of
as 2:2012cv00285
Plaintiff:
Charlese Graham
Defendant:
Hammond Indiana School City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cobb v. Hammond City of et al
as 2:2012cv00181
Plaintiff:
Barbara Cobb
Defendant:
Hammond City of , Hammond City of Police Department The and Officer D Sangkaratana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00142
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
