Cases 61 - 70 of 112
DEFILIPPO v. ALMEIDA
as 2:2017cv13026
Plaintiff:
VINCENT J DEFILIPPO
Defendant:
ANDRE J ALMEIDA, JOHN & JANE DOES 1-10 and JOHN & JANE DOES 11-20
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv13058
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
C.M.D. et al v. BRIDGEWAY REHABILITATION SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv08375
Plaintiff:
C.M.D. , RICHARD P. DOURIS and CARMELA M. DOURIS
Defendant:
BRIDGEWAY REHABILITATION SERVICES, INC., PROGRAM FOR ASSERTIVE COMMUNITY TREATMENT, PAULA TOWLE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SYKES et al v. JOHNS et al
as 1:2017cv07272
Defendant:
ANDREW B JOHNS , DAVID WEINSTEIN , CRAIG REINER and others
Plaintiff:
GERALD SYKES and MARGOT SYKES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LOZANO v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2017cv06581
Plaintiff:
GERONIMO LOZANO
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, ELIZABETH POLICE DEPARTMENT , RODNEY DORILUS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv06200
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv05775
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv04432
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv03208
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02907
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
