Cases 61 - 70 of 10,699
Petitphare v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv03955
Defendant:
The New York City Police Department, John Does Officers and The City of New York
Plaintiff:
ROLAND PETITPHARE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03961
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03961
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Nunez v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv03856
Plaintiff:
Jennison Nunez
Defendant:
The City of New York, Anthony Tolba and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Melvin v. City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv04118
Defendant:
Mona Sehgal, Bryan Sanchez, James S. Oddo and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney Melvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pynn v. Pynn et al
as 1:2024cv00508
Defendant:
Meghan Lutz, Matthew Pynn, Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Stacey Pynn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Santiago v. City of Rome et al
as 6:2024cv00704
Plaintiff:
Larry Santiago
Defendant:
City of Rome Police Department, Officer Joseph Longo, John Does #1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Maciol et al
as 6:2024cv00687
Defendant:
Connelly, John Doe, Oneida County Sheriff's Department and others
Plaintiff:
Wayne R. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Calderon v. Doe et al
as 1:2024cv03991
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe and Munaplity/Coperate Quo/8.30g
Plaintiff:
Samantha Calderon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03982
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2e Job Discrimination (Unlawful Employment Practices)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
