Cases 61 - 70 of 172
WURTZBACHER v. TOWNSHIP et al
as 1:2017cv05026
Plaintiff:
BERNARD WURTZBACHER
Defendant:
WINSLOW TOWNSHIP, ROBERT STIMELSKI, ROBERT GAUNTT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FARAGALLA v. JERSEY CITY et al
as 2:2017cv03604
Plaintiff:
SAMY FARAGALLA
Defendant:
JERSEY CITY , MORTON OTUNDO, JOHN DOES 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FOGG v. GLOUCESTER TOWNSHIP et al
as 1:2017cv02326
Plaintiff:
NORMAN BEN FOGG
Defendant:
GLOUCESTER TOWNSHIP, HARRY EARLE, JOHN DOES 6-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOSCUFO v. LONG BEACH TOWNSHIP et al
as 3:2017cv01973
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN J. MOSCUFO
Defendant:
LONG BEACH TOWNSHIP, BRENDAN M. KERLIN, THOMAS V. RUBEL, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv08152
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
CROWN v. ISLAND HEIGHTS et al
as 3:2016cv07711
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CROWN
Defendant:
ISLAND HEIGHTS, POLICE OFFICER IN CHARGE LT. KEVIN ARNOLD, LUKE TIRONDOLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv05135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
HICKS v. CAMDEN COUNTY et al
as 1:2016cv03436
Plaintiff:
RICHARD A HICKS, JR
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY, CAMDEN COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, CAMDEN COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, METRODIVISION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv03227
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
BRANEN v. JACKSON TOWNSHIP et al
as 3:2016cv03045
Plaintiff:
DENNIS J. BRANEN
Defendant:
JACKSON TOWNSHIP, MATTHEW D. KUNZ, JOHN DOES 6-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
