Cases 61 - 69 of 69
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2010cv06083
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2009cv06150
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Frisch v. City of Eugene et al
as 6:2009cv06126
Plaintiff:
Deborah Ellen Frisch
Defendant:
City of Eugene, Lane County, City of Springfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2009cv06063
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tuch v. Lane County Courthouse Government Lane County
as 6:2008cv06143
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Tuch
Defendant:
Lane County Courthouse Government Lane County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Phillip Lemons, et al v. Bill Bradbury, et al
as 08-35209
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PHILLIP LEMONS, SUSAN JARRETT, MYRNA HINES and others
Defendant - Appellee:
BILL BRADBURY, Secretary of the State of Oregon, in his official and individual capacity, ANNETTE K. NEWINGHAM, Lane County Clerk, in her official and individual capacity, JAN COLEMAN, Yamill County Clerk, in her official and individual capacity and others
Defendant-intervenor - Appellee:
JEANA FRAZZINI, ERIN SEXTON-SAYLOR, SALLY SPARKS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2007cv06285
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2007cv06218
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2007cv06089
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
