Cases 61 - 70 of 138
Grizzle v. Christian et al
as 6:2016cv00254
Plaintiff:
Kim Grizzle and Twila Grizzle
Defendant:
John Christian , Pontotoc County Board of County Commissioners , Arnold Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Madden v. Madden et al
as 5:2016cv00592
Plaintiff:
Robert Alan Madden
Defendant:
Andy Lee Madden and National Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Osburn v. Wagoner County Board of County Commissioners et al
as 6:2016cv00044
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Osburn
Defendant:
Wagoner County Board of County Commissioners and Kyle Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Haynes v. Railroad Retirement Board
as 5:2015cv01384
Plaintiff:
Roger Lee Haynes
Defendant:
Railroad Retirement Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2015cv00467
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626
Doane v. Davis et al
as 4:2015cv00501
Plaintiff:
Scotty Lee Doane
Defendant:
John Davis, Kelly Birch, David Simms and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frazier v. El Reno City of et al
as 5:2015cv00930
Plaintiff:
Tommy Lee Frazier
Defendant:
El Reno City of , Office of the District Attorney for the 4th District of The State of Oklahoma and Canadian County Board of County Commissioners
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pinney v. City of Tulsa, The et al
as 4:2015cv00281
Plaintiff:
Larry Delbert Pinney, Jr
Defendant:
City of Tulsa, The , Chuck Jordan , Wyett C Poth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Church of Holistic Science, Inc. v Bilder et al
as 4:2015cv00272
Plaintiff:
Church of Holistic Science, Inc.
Defendant:
Barry D Bilder, Karen Harr and Gail Rose
Third_party_plaintiff:
Everett Lee Stone and Angela Stone
Third_party_defendant:
Ruth Bilder and Beth Mathers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
