Cases 61 - 70 of 85
Vega v. Dunlap et al
as 1:2012cv04030
Defendant:
Department of Probation or Parole, Detective Scott Dunlap, Monroe County Correctional Facility and others
Partner:
Kenneth
Plaintiff:
David Vega
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gamez v. Criminal Probation department of NY et al
as 1:2012cv03811
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Brooks Gamez
Defendant:
Criminal Probation department of NY, DEA, Susan D. Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Campbell et al
as 7:2012cv03233
Plaintiff:
Alan Lewis Smith
Defendant:
Andre B. Campbell, Jason K. Farney, Dutchess County District Attorney's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gamez v. The State Of New York et al
as 1:2011cv08719
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Brooks Gamez
Defendant:
The State Of New York, The Eastern and Western Districts Courts, The NYPD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gamez v. NYS Probation Dept. et al
as 1:2011cv06130
Defendant:
L. Bloom, NYC Doc, NYS DEA 9910 NYC 11011 and others
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Brooks Gamez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Haskins v. Ulster County Department of Probation et al
as 1:2011cv01070
Plaintiff:
Malik Haskins
Defendant:
Ulster County Department of Probation and Ulster County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Komolafe v. Fowle et al
as 2:2011cv01713
Defendant:
John D. Fowle, Nassau County and Nassau County Probation Department
Plaintiff:
Adebisi Komolafe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00716
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2011cv00716
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Davis v. City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv00275
Plaintiff:
Tyree Davis
Defendant:
City of New York , Bureau Chief Gibson and New York City Department of Probation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
