Cases 61 - 70 of 72
Finch v. Hall et al
as 4:2010cv00093
Plaintiff:
Robert Curtis Finch
Defendant:
J. Randal Hall, B. Avant Edenfield, Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4301 U.S. Services Employment/Reemployment Act of 1994
Type:
Civil Rights
Bricker v. Cobb County Govt. & Personnel et al
as 1:2009mi00255
Plaintiff:
Jory J. Bricker
Defendant:
Cobb County Govt. & Personnel, Georgia State Govt & Personnel, P. Harris Hines and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Type:
Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv00413
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Randall v. Scott et al
as 1:2008cv02910
Plaintiff:
Earl Randall
Defendant:
Jewel Scott, Jewel Scott and Headley Leopold Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv00069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007mi00431
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv00208
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Futch v. Drug Enforcement Administration et al
as 4:2007cv00057
Plaintiff:
John Randall Futch
Defendant:
Drug Enforcement Administration and The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
