Cases 61 - 70 of 102
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00809
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Murray v. Rutherford County Sherriff's Office et al
as 3:2015cv00203
Plaintiff:
Robert Kenneth Murray, Jr.
Defendant:
Rutherford County Sherriff's Office, F/n/u Arrington, f/n/u Buchanan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ogletree v. Vanderveer et al
as 3:2014cv02406
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Ogletree, Jr.
Defendant:
James Vanderveer and Rutherford County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00138
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Williams v. City of Murfreesboro, Tennessee et al
as 3:2013cv00683
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Williams
Defendant:
City of Murfreesboro, Tennessee, Keith Sanders, Richard Presley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00658
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe et al v. Rutherford County, Tennessee, Board of Education
as 3:2013cv00328
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe , John Doe and Mary Doe
Defendant:
Rutherford County, Tennessee, Board of Education
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX of Education Amendment of 1972
Doughtie & Company, Inc. v. Rutherford County et al
as 3:2013cv00209
Plaintiff:
Doughtie & Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Rutherford County , Rutherford County Probate Clerk's Office , Lisa Crowell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mayers v. Rutherford County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2012cv01204
Plaintiff:
Miguel Mayers, IV
Defendant:
Rutherford County, Tennessee , Nick Coble , Shane Vaughn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
