Cases 61 - 70 of 1,122
McNair v. Utica Police Department et al
as 6:2023cv00699
Plaintiff:
Brandon T. McNair
Defendant:
Utica Police Department, Judge Michael L. Dwyer, Oneida County Courts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04580
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415 IDEA: Challenge decision re education for handicapped
Harris v. Denully et al
as 1:2023cv04601
Plaintiff:
Laquan Devota Harris
Defendant:
Shane Denully, P.O. Micheal Jordan, Michael Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lieberman v. Sullivan et al
as 1:2023cv04195
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey A. Lieberman, M.D.
Defendant:
Ann Marie T. Sullivan, M.D., Moira Tashjian, Thomas E. Smith, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03951
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415 IDEA: Challenge decision re education for handicapped
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03433
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03546
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2ot Job Discrimination (other)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Clemente et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2023cv02702
Plaintiff:
Jayshawn Clemente and Deonte Holley
Defendant:
The City of New York, Sergeant Anthony Bomparola, Detective Jonathan R. Dias and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
