Cases 61 - 70 of 131
Walters v. Walton et al
as 4:2014cv00716
Plaintiff:
Terry Walters
Defendant:
Scott Walton , Jon Sappington , Dan Dozier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv01096
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626
Powell et al v. Avalon Correctional Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv00535
Plaintiff:
Samuel Powell , Derek Schell , Codie Shreve and others
Defendant:
Avalon Correctional Services, Inc. , Donald Coffman, Terry Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Camren v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 4:2014cv00361
Plaintiff:
Dennis K Camren
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma , Oklahoma Department of Corrections , Ottawa County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Affordable Bail Bonds, Inc. et al v. Tulsa County Sheriff's Office et al
as 4:2014cv00332
Plaintiff:
Affordable Bail Bonds, Inc. , Roberta Dampf-Aguilar and Terry J Horton
Defendant:
Tulsa County Sheriff's Office, Stanley Glanz, Thomas Huckeby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ward v. United States
as 6:2014cv00192
Plaintiff:
Terry Ward
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2014cv00167
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lewis v. Cuke et al
as 5:2014cv00278
Plaintiff:
Marion Lewis
Defendant:
FNU Cuke, Terri White and Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2014cv00066
Plaintiff:
Nancy Edwards
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections , Randall Workman and Terry Crenshaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sharp v. Pittsburg County Board of County Commissioners et al
as 6:2014cv00027
Plaintiff:
William Sharp
Defendant:
Pittsburg County Board of County Commissioners, Department of Public Safety and Terry Stanford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
