Cases 61 - 70 of 117
mere mortal man v. United States Corporation et al
as 3:2015cv00606
Plaintiff:
Joseph mere mortal man
Defendant:
United States Corporation and Commonwealth of Kentucky Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hobson v. United States Government
as 5:2015cv00125
Plaintiff:
Ronald H. Hobson
Defendant:
United States Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hobson v. United States Government
as 5:2015cv00062
Plaintiff:
Ronald H. Hobson
Defendant:
United States Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. United States Navy et al
as 5:2015cv00054
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Thomas, Jr.
Defendant:
United States Navy, McCracken County, Kentucky, Guardianship Offices of Ken Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Skudnov v. U.S. Department of HUD et al
as 3:2015cv00100
Plaintiff:
Boris Nickolaevich Skudnov
Defendant:
U.S. Department of HUD, Housing Aothority of Bowling Green, (CHFS) Office of the Secretary and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mize et al v. United States Marshal Service et al
as 1:2014cv00171
Plaintiff:
Sandra L. Mize and Corey Mize
Defendant:
United States Marshal Service, Jackie Strode, Tom Maxwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrew et al v. United States of America
as 3:2014cv00355
Plaintiff:
Bryson Andrew and Henrietta Andrew
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Lea v. United States Department of Agrigculture et al
as 1:2014cv00040
Plaintiff:
Corey Lea
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture, Tom Vilsack, Joe Leonard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791
Lasseter v. U.S. Government
as 5:2014cv00002
Plaintiff:
Chad Lasseter
Defendant:
United States Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
