Cases 71 - 80 of 150
ROBINSON v. FOUNTAS et al
as 1:2015cv01405
Plaintiff:
DANA ROBINSON
Defendant:
MICHAEL FOUNTAS, SOPER, VICTOR DIAZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REED v. NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE et al
as 1:2015cv01305
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY L. REED, IV.
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE, NEW JERSEY STATE TROOPER "JOHN DOE, WINSLOW TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARISTEO v. COUNTY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2015cv00769
Plaintiff:
BRUCE ARISTEO
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CAMDEN, CAMDEN COUNTY OFFICE OF THE PROSECUTOR, JODY RAINES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv07718
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
WITHERSPOON v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2014cv07683
Plaintiff:
DESMOND WITHERSPOON
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
QUEENSBURY v. PETRONE et al
as 1:2014cv07230
Plaintiff:
SHERRON K. QUEENSBURY
Defendant:
DANA PETRONE , JOHN/JANE DOE(S) 1-5 and CAMDEN COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv07160
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DICKERSON v. COUNTY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2014cv06905
Plaintiff:
DARREN A. DICKERSON
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CAMDEN, CAMDEN COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, NIGEL SHOCKLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TOMASZEWSKI v. CAMDEN COUNTY PARKS DEPT. et al
as 1:2014cv06649
Plaintiff:
SCOT JOHN TOMASZEWSKI
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY PARKS DEPT. , CAMDEN COUNTY POLICE/SHERIFFS , CAMDEN COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
INGRAM v. COUNTY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2014cv05519
Plaintiff:
XAVIER INGRAM
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CAMDEN, CAMDEN COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, JEREMY MERCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
