Cases 71 - 80 of 143
CRISDON v. CITY OF CAMDEN
as 1:2011cv02087
Plaintiff:
MYRON N. CRISDON
Defendant:
CITY OF CAMDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BEVERLY v. FIGUEROA et al
as 1:2011cv01893
Plaintiff:
SHAWN BEVERLY
Defendant:
ANTONIO FIGUEROA, ANTHONY RAO , J. RODRIGUEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MCLEAN v. FIGUEROA et al
as 1:2011cv01894
Plaintiff:
MELVIN MCLEAN
Defendant:
ANTONIO FIGUEROA, DAN MORRIS, ARTURO VENEGAS, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WINGATE v. CITY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2011cv01592
Plaintiff:
VINSON WINGATE
Defendant:
CITY OF CAMDEN , CITY OF CAMDEN DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY , LUIS SANCHEZ and others
Movant:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IN RE: CAMDEN POLICE CASES
as 1:2011cv01315
Plaintiff:
ALANDA FORREST , JEFFREY HICKS , FRANK SHAW and others
Defendant:
KEVIN PARRY, JASON STETSER, CITY OF CAMDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WILLIAMS v. POLICE OFFICER ROBERT BAYARD et al
as 1:2011cv01336
Plaintiff:
CARVIN WILLIAMS
Defendant:
POLICE OFFICER ROBERT BAYARD, POLICE OFFICER ANTONIO FIGUEROA, JOHN DOES I-IV and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RUIZ v. CITY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2011cv00971
Plaintiff:
OSCAR RUIZ
Defendant:
CITY OF CAMDEN, CITY OF CAMDEN POLICE DEPARTMENT, CAMDEN COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GIBSON v. ARTHUR et al
as 1:2011cv00959
Plaintiff:
PAUL J. GIBSON
Defendant:
WILLIAM ARTHUR, JASON STETSER, MAURICE S. GIBSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TRAYLOR v. CITY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2011cv00891
Plaintiff:
JOHN C. TRAYLOR
Defendant:
CITY OF CAMDEN , CITY OF CAMDEN DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY , CAMDEN CITY POLICE OFFICER JASON STETSER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CARMICHAEL v. CITY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2011cv00512
Plaintiff:
OBIE CARMICHAEL
Defendant:
CITY OF CAMDEN, CAMDEN COUNTY, CAMDEN COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
