Cases 71 - 80 of 97
Popescu v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitations et al
as 3:2013cv00564
Plaintiff:
Virgil Popescu
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitations, Parole Department, James Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pickup, et. al. v. Brown, et. al.
as 2:2012cv02497
Plaintiff:
David H. Pickup , Christopher H. Rosick , Joseph Nicolosi and others
Defendant:
Edmund G. Brown , Anna M. Caballero , Kim Madsen and others
Intervenor:
Equality California
Movant:
Donald Welch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jane Doe 1 et al v. City of Simi Valley et al
as 2:2012cv08377
Defendant:
City of Simi Valley and Does
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 2, Jane Doe 5, Jane Doe 7 and others
American News and Information Services, Inc. et al v. Gore et al
as 3:2012cv02186
Defendant:
Jan Caldwell, William D. Gore, Thomas Seiver and others
Plaintiff:
American News and Information Services, Inc., James C. Playford and Edward A. Peruta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv
Marianne Stahl et al v. Garret DeGiorgio et al
as 8:2012cv01061
Defendant:
Charles Alcanter, Brent Benson, David Cappel and others
Plaintiff:
Val Jean Bureau and Marianne Stahl
Bologna et al v. Escondido, City of et al
as 3:2012cv01243
Plaintiff:
Matthew Bologna and Jake Worts
Defendant:
Escondido, City of , Alva , Stuard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James L Miller v. Amir Kashani et al
as 2:2012cv03601
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3 and others
Plaintiff:
James L Miller
James L Miller v. Amir Kashani et al
as 2:2012cv03137
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3 and others
Plaintiff:
James L Miller
James L. Miller v. Dr. Amir Kashani et al
as 2:2012cv01660
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3 and others
Plaintiff:
James L. Miller
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01527
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
