Cases 71 - 80 of 275
Haberman-Ducey v. Russell et al
as 3:2021cv00890
Defendant:
Russel Burger, Gabriel Russell, Andrew Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Nathan Haberman-Ducey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadous v. City of Portland et al
as 3:2021cv00771
Defendant:
John Doe and Nicholas Morales
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
City of Portland
Plaintiff:
Melvin Broadous
3Rd Party Defendant:
Daniel Robert Rowland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2021cv00702
Defendant:
John-Michael Theisen, State of Oregon, John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Mathew Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Mead v. Russell et al
as 3:2021cv00672
Defendant:
Russel E. Burger, Gabriel Russell, Andrew Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Angeline Mead
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cohen v. Russell et al
as 3:2021cv00579
Defendant:
Russel Burger, Gabriel Russell, Andrew Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Nate Cohen and Nathan Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Ahern v. Kammerer et al
as 3:2021cv00561
Defendant:
City of Portland, Erik Kammerer and John Does 1-5
Plaintiff:
Hannah Ahern
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kristiansen et al v. Russell et al
as 3:2021cv00546
Defendant:
Russel Burger, Gabriel Russell, Andrew Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Kristiansen and John Hacker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pacholl v. Clackamas County et al
as 3:2021cv00538
Defendant:
Sherie Chaney, Crystal Boyer, Carrie Rall and others
Plaintiff:
Fred R. Pacholl, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Van Loo Fiduciary Services, LLC v. State of Oregon, et al
as 6:2021cv00430
Defendant:
John Does 1-10, Tomme Ralls and State of Oregon
Plaintiff:
Van Loo Fiduciary Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Van Loo Fiduciary Services, LLC v. State of Oregon, et al
as 3:2021cv00430
Defendant:
John Does 1-10, Tomme Ralls and State of Oregon
Plaintiff:
Van Loo Fiduciary Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
