Cases 71 - 80 of 98
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2010cv06393
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Schoen v. State of Oregon et al
as 2:2010cv01364
Defendant:
City of Enterprise, County of Wallowa, Enterprise Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Desiree Schoen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Murillo et al v. Monterey Springs Holding LLC et al
as 3:2010cv01206
Defendant:
Monterey Springs Holding LLC and Riverstone Residential West, LLC
Plaintiff:
Martha Murillo and K. R-M.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2010cv01188
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv01038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00809
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00761
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
DeMartino v. State of Oregon et al
as 6:2010cv06176
Defendant:
Pamela Abernethy, David Brewer, Jeff Carter and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. DeMartino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Pickens v. Shinseki
as 3:2010cv00683
Plaintiff:
Darryl Pickens
Defendant:
Eric K. Shinseki
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gutierrez v. Houchin et al
as 6:2009cv06291
Plaintiff:
Candice Gutierrez
Defendant:
Larry K. Houchin, John Hitt, City of Lebanon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
