Civil Rights Cases filed in Connecticut
Cases 71 - 80 of 303
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv02100
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Whitnum v. Office of the Chief State's Attorney et al
as 3:2018cv01991
Defendant: Kevin Kane and Office of the Chief State's Attorney
Plaintiff: L. Lee Whitnum and L. "Lee" Whitnum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01733
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01569
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Calhoun v. Borona et al
as 3:2018cv01203
Defendant: Joseph Morales, Mark Blackwell, Jason Amato and others
Plaintiff: Shannon L. Calhoun
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
R. v. Sessions et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv01106
Defendant: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Alex Azar, Department of Homeland Security and others
Plaintiff: J. S. R.
Consolidated Plaintiff: V. F. B.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ortiz v. McVey et al
as 3:2018cv01173
Defendant: Vincent Tinnerello and Kelly McVey
Plaintiff: Raymond L. Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
B. v. Sessions et al
as 3:2018cv01110
Defendant: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Alex Azar, Jefferson B. Sessions, III and others
Plaintiff: V. F. B.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Whitnum v. Hearst Corporation et al
as 3:2018cv01080
Defendant: John Nickerson, Daniel Tepfer, Stamford Advocate and others
Plaintiff: L. Lee Whitnum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Shuckra et al v. Wardwell et al
as 3:2018cv01013
Plaintiff: Christopher Shuckra and Santos Collazo
Defendant: City of New Britain , James P. Wardwell , Christopher Chute and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?