Cases 71 - 80 of 169
PLUMMER v. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF COLUMBUS, GEORGIA
as 4:2018cv00032
Plaintiff:
MIRCHELLE T PLUMMER
Defendant:
HOUSING AUTHORITY OF COLUMBUS, GEORGIA, LEN WILLIAMS, LISA WALTERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Edwards et al v. The City of Sky Valley Georgia et al
as 2:2017cv00279
Plaintiff:
Lisa Edwards , Stanley C. Rushton, Jr. and Madeleine Marie Taylor
Defendant:
The City of Sky Valley Georgia , Hughel Goodgame and Robert Mason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GREEN v. MOULTRIE POLICE DEPT
as 7:2017cv00200
Plaintiff:
JAKESHA GREEN
Defendant:
MOULTRIE POLICE DEPT, MOULTRIE, CITY OF, CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
K.A. et al v. HOBBY et al
as 1:2017cv00099
Plaintiff:
K.A. , T.S. , B.S. and others
Defendant:
JEFF HOBBY, JOHN BRANNEN, TYLER TURNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horne v. Harbour Portfolio VII, LP et al
as 1:2017cv00954
Defendant:
Harbour Portfolio VII, LP, CWAM II, LLC, Harbour Portfolio VI, LP and others
Plaintiff:
Horne, Demarkus R. Horne, Jackie Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
DOE v. CITY OF PELHAM, GEORGIA et al
as 1:2017cv00031
Plaintiff:
LISA T DOE
Defendant:
CITY OF PELHAM and DENNIS LOGAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Varnadore v. Merritt
as 2:2017cv00013
Plaintiff:
Lisa Veronica Varnadore
Defendant:
Brandon Merritt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Belvett v. Housing Authority of DeKalb County
as 1:2016cv03939
Plaintiff:
Lisa Belvett
Defendant:
Housing Authority of DeKalb County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Bryant v. Puhl et al
as 1:2016cv03712
Plaintiff:
Hattie Mae Bryant
Defendant:
Todd Puhl, Pamela Monroe, Mark Richts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
