Cases 71 - 80 of 105
Blueberry et al v. Comanche County Facilities Authority et al
as 5:2013cv00278
Plaintiff:
Natasha Blueberry , Frances Burrell , Kathern Easter and others
Defendant:
Comanche County Facilities Authority , Lamont Rainwater, Dale Cagle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. McAlester, City of et al
as 6:2012cv00468
Plaintiff:
Nakina Williams
Defendant:
McAlester, City of, Jim Lyles and Sterling Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00581
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00582
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00779
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Taylor v. City of Bixby
as 4:2012cv00066
Plaintiff:
Geron R Taylor
Defendant:
City of Bixby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Lee et al v. First United Bank and Trust et al
as 4:2011cv00637
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lee and Hannah Lee
Defendant:
First United Bank and Trust and Shannon Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cox v. Glanz et al
as 4:2011cv00457
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Cox
Defendant:
Stanley Glanz , Tulsa County Sheriff's Department, Tulsa County Board of Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vann v. Wieneke et al
as 4:2011cv00180
Plaintiff:
Tony L Vann
Defendant:
Dennis L Wieneke, Peggy L Wieneke, Randle Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2011cv00022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
