Cases 71 - 80 of 98
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv03929
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv07610
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
TORRES v. DAVIS et al
as 1:2011cv06190
Plaintiff:
EDWARD D. TORRES
Defendant:
SARA DAVIS, DANA . REDD, THE COMMISSIONER OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY BOARD OF EDUCATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv04254
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
BOSTROM et al v. NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES et al
as 1:2011cv01424
Plaintiff:
DANELLE BOSTROM , STEPHEN BOSTROM and J.B.
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES , NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES , DENISE SCHUH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00220
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv03152
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
TORRES et al v. CAMDEN CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION
as 1:2010cv00346
Plaintiff:
EUNICE TORRES, JENNIFER (RENTAS) TORRES and AMARILYS (RENTAS) TORRES
Defendant:
CAMDEN CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
TORRES et al v. FRANKLIN TOWNSHIP
as 1:2009cv06282
Plaintiff:
MARION TORRES, JAIME TORRES, GREENWAYS OF FRANKLIN, LLC and others
Defendant:
FRANKLIN TOWNSHIP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
