Cases 71 - 80 of 96
McMeans v. City of Austin Police Dept. et al
as 1:2014cv00078
Defendant:
City of Austin Police Dept. and Travis County Sherif Dept.
Plaintiff:
Bruce M. McMeans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Reynaldo Muniz Jr. v. Chancy Davis et al
as 1:2013cv00666
Defendant:
Art Acevedo, Chancy Davis, Tim Little and others
Plaintiff:
Reynaldo Muniz, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Osborne et al v. State of Texas et al
as 1:2013cv00528
Defendant:
Board of Law Examiners, Buck Files, State of Texas and others
Plaintiff:
Jamar Osborne and Mikal Osborne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Earles et al v. Travis County
as 1:2012cv01179
Plaintiff:
Brent Earles and Jane Earles
Defendant:
Travis County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zimmerman et al v. Travis County Healthcare District et al
as 1:2012cv00972
Plaintiff:
Michael Cargill, Mario Jordan, Travis County Taxpayers Union SPAC and others
Defendant:
Travis County Healthcare District
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973 Voting Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Calvillo v. The Travis County, Texas
as 1:2012cv00170
Plaintiff:
Alberto Calvillo
Defendant:
The Travis County, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01085
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00615
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
